In 1754, a small pamphlet war erupted in France over the question of whether Italian opera was inherently superior to French opera, a controversy that became known as the Querelle des Bouffons, the war of the clowns. Specifically, the elaborate full-length operas of Jean-Philippe Rameau were being compared to the two-act chamber opera La Serva Padrona by Giovanni Pergolesi, which had premiered in 1733 and was revived in Paris in 1752. La Serva Padrona (The Maid as Mistress) has just two singing roles and a handful of instrumental parts. It can be given in a small room and lasts about 45 minutes.
Why all this fuss over a little operatic intermezzo? Jean-Jacques Rousseau and his sometime ally Baron von Grimm used the contrast between these two operatic worlds as a covert way to mount a political critique of the French monarchy. But why did they pick this work as their battering ram against the absolute power of Louis XV? I believe it's because the heroine, Serpina, is such a breath of fresh air. Yet she is nothing new. Her type, the soubrette, typically a saucy servant girl, descends from Columbina in commedia del arte, and stage roles like Dorina in Moliere's Tartuffe. In classical opera, the soubrette is so well defined that the term denotes a specific vocal range and quality. Mozart wrote a dozen such roles, including both Suzanna and Barberina in Le Nozze di Figaro.
In La Serva Padrona we find her atomic avatar, Serpina, engaged in one-on-one combat with her tyrannical boss. In her first aria from the second act, A Serpina Penserete, Serpina has dressed her fellow servant, the mute Vespone, as a furious soldier whom she says she is about to marry. She addresses her employer Umberto with feigned tenderness and vulnerability, alternating this with mocking asides.
A Serpina penserete
Qualche volta, e qualche di'
E direte: Ah! poverina,
Cara un tempo ella mi fu.
(Ei mi par che gia' pian piano
S'incomincia a intenerir.)
S'io poi fui impertinente,
Mi perdoni: malamente
Mi guidai: lo vedo, si'.
(Ei mi stringe per la mano,
Meglio il fatto non puo gir.)
You'll think of Serpina
sometime, some day,
and you'll say "Oh, poor little one!
Once, she was dear to me."
(It seems that, bit by bit,
he's starting to soften up.)
If I was impertinent,
please forgive me;
I behaved badly, I see that.
(Now he takes my hand--
It doesn't get any better than this!
(my translation)
This is both romantic and comic. Serpina explicitly inverts her social and sexual role relation with Umberto, as the opera's title promises, drawing the spectator into a complicity that implies a tinge of submission. We sense that her wily guidance will ultimately save the pompous Umberto. This is not role reversal as perversity; it's closer to a template for companionable marriage.
But for Rousseau and his allies, Serpina is yet more symbolic as a subverter of absolute authority. Long after this war of clowns is done she will re-appear, far from the operatic stage, treading corpses, bare breasted, waving a flag. And once again, majestically immobilized, lifting a torch at the mouth of a great harbor.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
So, who won the war? The Hapsburg's?
The Wittelsbach's? Delacroix?
Originally the sea-punk servant girl turned beacon-goddess was to stand at Port Said, but alas, Khedive Ismail spent so much money futilely wooing Eugenie, commissioning but not getting 'Aida' for the opening of the Canal (Verdi was late delivering) that she was sent packing to America that has never really gotten its opera chops together. Perhaps victory falls to Adam Lambert?
Thank you, Keith. Do you want to weigh in on the pro-Rameau tip?
Hi Jonathan, Steve Provizer directed me to your blog. I really enjoyed this piece on the Querelle des Bouffons, and I've recently been listening to Gretry's "Maginifique," which seems to unite the Italian lyrical/comic tradition into the French form nicely. If only these sides knew!
thanks for the invitation JS, but I wouldn't touch the literary/political content of Rameau's oeuvre with a ten ft. Pollux!
Keith, would you Castor your lot with Rameau as an opera-lover? Will nobody pimp for polyphony?
Glad to have Andrew's shout-out to Gretry. I'm not familiar with any of his work, though I'd like to be.
While his opera's help to establish his credibility as a major composer in a time of prolificacy, Rameau's ideas and innovation were more or less completely expressed in his keyboard works. As has been said about Rameau, a shadowy figure in the history of music, or musicians, he would disappear when the lid of the clavecin was closed. The greater fame was to go to his nephew for altogether other reasons...
If your biggest, revelatory idea of the year is contained in the exposition within the Sarabande of your third suite de clavecin (sic), the chances of its ever being heard beyond le chambre du Roi were remote. Whereas if that harmonic progression, or melodic suspension were worked into the final aria of the second act of an opera seen and heard by thousands, your sphere of influence is more broadly felt.
To compose and produce an opera requires a certain degree of hubris that does not comport with what we know about Rameau. He was the King's clavecinist and was probably required by contract to produce operas on schedule. At the time, there were natural conventions in story telling that were dictated by and generally understood within a class/populace concentrically arranged around Versailles. Bucking the system, challenging the king, was just not an option. Mozart was a modernist, he just couldn't help himself, Rameau was the establishment, albeit under what he must have felt was the tedious, conventional thinking of Lully.
So, in his operas, to my thinking, we have unchallenging hierarchical parables from the classics standing as vehicles for enlightened thinking about composition. Experiments in the efficacy of his wholly original thinking in harmony, counterpoint, meter and somewhat coincidentally, orchestral timbre.
Rameau's innovation was not in how he challenged the social status quo by his selection of subjects but in how he regulated and codified the relationship between tonality and human emotion. Where Bach's, by comparison, mechanical formalization of relative keys and equal temperament revolutionized the possibilities of modulation, Rameau calibrated those tonalities to the human spirit and emotional sentiment.
The influence of his ideas were absorbed almost instantly, universally, and remain fundamental to this day, the vector being mostly though the popularity of his operas.
Post a Comment